4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Effect of Temperature on the Geological Sequestration of CO(2)in a Layered Carbonate Formation

出版社

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4046137

关键词

geological carbon sequestration; storage efficiency; reactive transport processes; carbonate; underground injection and storage

资金

  1. United States Geological Survey (USGS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Geological sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in deep saline aquifers is one of the most promising technologies for large-scale CO(2)mitigation. Temperature can play a significant role in the ensuing geochemistry, affecting equilibria in a multicomponent system and impacting reactive transport processes. The objectives of this study are to quantify the effect of temperature on storage efficiency, solubility trapping of CO2, pH of residual brine, and changes in the mineralogy and porosity. Usingtoughreact3.3 (a reactive transport simulator), we have simulated the injection of CO(2)into a heterogeneous layered carbonate formation for a period of 50 years, followed by a 50-year equilibration period with no injection. Mineralogy and physical properties of the simulated aquifer are based on a dolomitic limestone aquifer located within the South Florida Basin. Simulations were conducted for seven values of temperature. Density of supercritical CO(2)decreases with an increase in temperature, which leads to higher buoyancy at elevated temperatures. Therefore, the storage efficiency of the aquifer decreases as temperature increases. Simulation results indicate that an increase in temperature from 35 degrees C to 95 degrees C results in a 35% decrease in storage efficiency. However, surprisingly, solubility trapping of CO(2)increases with an increase in temperature because the interfacial area increases with temperature. Temperature effects on pH and on porosity change (due to mineral dissolution and precipitation) are small. The study can be helpful in screening a reservoir for geological carbon storage based on the formation temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据