4.1 Article

Heartbeat classification using deep residual convolutional neural network from 2-lead electrocardiogram

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY
卷 58, 期 -, 页码 105-112

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.11.046

关键词

Heartbeat classification; Arrhythmia Deep learning; Residual convolutional neural network; ECG signals; 2-Lead

资金

  1. Key Research and Development Project of Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2019YFG0192]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The electrocardiogram (ECG) has been widely used in the diagnosis of heart disease such as arrhythmia due to its simplicity and non-invasive nature. Arrhythmia can be classified into many types, including lifethreatening and non-life-threatening. Accurate detection of arrhythmic types can effectively prevent heart disease and reduce mortality. Methods: In this study, a novel deep learning method for classification of cardiac arrhythmia according to deep residual network (ResNet) is presented. We developed a 31-layer one-dimensional (1D) residual convolutional neural network. The algorithm includes four residual blocks, each of which consists of three 1D convolution layers, three batch normalization (BP) layers, three rectified linear unit (ReLU) layers, and an identity shortcut connections structure. In addition, we propose to use 2-lead ECG signals in combination with deep learning methods to automatically identify five different types of heartbeats. Results: We have obtained an average accuracy, sensitivity and positive predictivity of 99.06%, 93.21% and 96.76% respectively for single-lead ECG heartbeats. In the 2-lead datasets, the results show that the deep ResNet model has high classification performance, achieving an accuracy of 99.38%, sensitivity of 94.54%, and specificity of 98.14%. Conclusion: The proposed method can be used as an adjunct tool to assist clinicians in their diagnosis. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据