4.7 Article

Amperometric sensor based on MWNT and electropolymerized carminic acid for the simultaneous quantification of TBHQ and BHA

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.113885

关键词

Voltammetry; Modified electrodes; Electropolymerization; Carminic acid; TBHQ; BHA

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [18-33-00220-mol_a]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amperometric sensor based on the layer-by-layer combination of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and electropolymerized carminic acid deposited on the glassy carbon electrode surface (poly(carminic acid)/MWNT/ GCE) has been developed for the simultaneous quantification of tert-butylhydroquinone (TBHQ) and butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA). Conditions of poly(carminic acid) coverage obtaining have been found on the basis of TBHQ and BHA peak potential separation and oxidation currents. The best parameters have been observed for poly(carminic acid) electrodeposited from 50 mu mol L-1 monomer solution by seven-fold cycling of potential in the range of 0.3-0.8 V with the scan rate of 50 mV s(-1) in Britton-Robinson buffer (BRB) pH 2.0. Electrodes have been characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and electrochemical methods. Good resolution of TBHQ and BHA oxidation potentials equalled to 190 mV has been obtained on the poly(carminic acid)/MWNT/GCE vs. 146 mV on MWNT/GCE. The oxidation currents are 2.1- and 1.8-fold increased on polymer-modified electrode for TBHQ and BHA, respectively. Parameters of TBHQ and BHA electrooxidation on poly(carminic acid)/MWNT/GCE have been calculated. Sensor response is linear in the range of 0.50-75 mu mol L-1 for TBHQ and 0.25-75 mu mol L-1 for BHA with the limits of detection of 0.36 and 0.23 mu mol L-1, respectively. Sensor selectivity in the presence of inorganic ions, ascorbic acid and atocopherol is confirmed. The sensor developed has been tested on the linseed oil. The recovery of 100-103% confirm high accuracy of the approach. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据