4.3 Review

Long-term topical management of psoriasis: the road ahead

期刊

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 111-120

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1729335

关键词

Long-term management; psoriasis; topicals; corticosteroids; proactive

资金

  1. LEO Pharma Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews the unmet needs in long-term management of psoriasis, suggesting that topical therapies could be the best treatment option in certain phases of the chronic disease. It calls for clinical alignment on terminology, recommending 'long-term management' as the most appropriate term, and provides recommendations for the implementation of topicals as part of long-term management strategies.
Topical therapies have been available for the treatment of psoriasis for several decades. Despite this and the availability of several types of topicals, with varying potency, and numerous vehicles of administration, the majority of clinical data and guidance is on short-term use in the management of psoriasis. The aim of this manuscript is to review the unmet needs that exist in the long-term management of psoriasis and provide the dermatology community with an understanding that a treatment regimen with topical therapies could be the best treatment option at least for some phases of this chronic relapsing disease. We present a 'call to action' on the need for clinical alignment on terminology in the field and recommend the term 'long-term management' be adopted as the most appropriate in the context of this manuscript. This expert opinion report provides a detailed review of the limited evidence available regarding long-term use of topical therapies for the management of psoriasis, alongside our key considerations and recommendations to assist dermatologists with the implementation of topicals as part of long-term management strategies. Long-term management should be considered mandatory to ensure patients receive appropriate proactive treatment which may help optimize adherence and long-term outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据