4.8 Article

Tyrosine modified irinotecan-loaded liposomes capable of simultaneously targeting LAT1 and ATB0,+ for efficient tumor therapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 316, 期 -, 页码 22-33

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.037

关键词

LAT1; ATB(0,+); CPT-11; Amino acid transporter; Dual-targeted liposomes; Active drug loading

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [U1608283]
  2. Career Development Program for Young and Middle-aged Teachers in Shenyang Pharmaceutical University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As the demand for nutrients in malignant proliferation of tumors increases, the L-type amino acid transporter 1(LAT1) and amino acid transporter B-0,B-+ (ATB(0,+)) of tumor cells are more highly expressed than normal cells which can be used as new targets for active targeting of cancer. However, drug delivery systems often require multi-target design to achieve simultaneous targeting of different receptors or transporters due to the heterogeneity of the tumor. Here we utilized triethylamine-sucrose octasulfate gradient to actively encapsulate irinotecan into the introliposomal aqueous phase. Targeted ability was achieved through inserting different amino acids modified polyethylene glycol monostearate into the liposomes, and found that glutamate-liposomes can be targeted to LAT1, lysine-liposomes can be targeted to ATB(0,+), and inspiringly, tyrosine-liposomes can be simultaneously targeted to LAT1 and ATB(0,+). The tyrosine-modified liposomes showed the highest cellular uptake in BxPC-3 and MCF-7 cells which were highly expressed both LAT1 and ATB(0,+). Moreover, we validated their targeting capabilities and elucidated the transport mechanism of LAT1 and ATB(0,+)-mediated endocytosis. The tumor inhibition rate of tyrosine-modified liposomes greatly increased from 39% to 87% compared with commercially available liposomes loaded CPT-11(Onivyde (R)). Overall, it showed a good application prospect for efficient tumor therapy and industrial production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据