4.6 Review

Transcranial direct current stimulation for acute major depressive episodes: meta-analysis of individual patient data

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 208, 期 6, 页码 522-+

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.164715

关键词

-

资金

  1. Brain & Behavior Research Foundation [20493]
  2. Sao Paulo State Foundation [20911-5]
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [470904]
  4. neuroConn GmbH, Ilmenau, Germany
  5. Brainsway Inc, Jerusalem, Israel
  6. Australian National Health and Medical Council
  7. Stanley Medical Research Foundation
  8. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  9. US National Institute of Health (NIH)
  10. Brainsway Ltd
  11. Lundbeck Foundation
  12. Ontario Mental Health Foundation (OMHF)
  13. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  14. Brain and Behaviour Research Foundation
  15. Temerty Family through the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) Foundation
  16. Grant Family through the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) Foundation
  17. Campbell Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-pharmacological intervention for depression. It has mixed results, possibly caused by study heterogeneity. Aims To assess tDCS efficacy and to explore individual response predictors. Method Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Results Data were gathered from six randomised sham-controlled trials, enrolling 289 patients. Active tDCS was significantly superior to sham for response (34% v. 19% respectively, odds ratio (OR) = 2.44, 95% CI 1.38-4.32, number needed to treat (NNT) = 7), remission (23.1% v. 12.7% respectively, OR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.22-4.64, NNT = 9) and depression improvement (B coefficient 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-0.57). Mixed-effects models showed that, after adjustment for other predictors and confounders, treatment-resistant depression and higher tDCS 'doses' were, respectively, negatively and positively associated with tDCS efficacy. Conclusions The effect size of tDCS treatment was comparable with those reported for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and antidepressant drug treatment in primary care. The most important parameters for optimisation in future trials are depression refractoriness and tDCS dose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据