4.7 Article

Configurations of lead(II)-benzohydroxamic acid complexes in colloid and interface: A new perspective

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 562, 期 -, 页码 342-351

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.11.115

关键词

Benzohydroxamic acid; Configuration; XPS; DFT; TOF-SIMS

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51804340]
  2. Innovation Driven Plan of Central South University [2018CX036]
  3. National Project 111 [B14034]
  4. National Key Scientific Research Project [2018YFC1901601, 2018YFC1901602]
  5. Collaborative Innovation Center for Clean and Efficient Utilization of Strategic Metal Mineral Resources

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lead(II)-benzohydroxamic acid (Pb-BHA) complex collectors perform well with respect to scheelite flotation, and, due to their structure, they are widely used for industrial purposes. This paper examines the controversial issue of whether O, O five-membered ring or N, O four-membered ring complexes are formed when BHA coordinates with Pb ions, with their structure being comprehensively studied from the aspect of colloid and interface science. The configurations of Pb-BHA complexes are examined in a solution and on a mineral surface with experimental and computational methods. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and density functional theory (DFT) revealed that the five-membered ring is the dominant form of Pb-BHA complexes in a solution, whereas four-membered ring complexes are the stronger electron acceptor of the two. Moreover, XPS and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) confirmed that the four-membered ring complexes are stable with respect to being adsorbed on the scheelite surface. Therefore, although the four-membered ring is not as stable as the five-membered ring in a solution, it offers advantages with respect to adsorption on an electron-rich mineral surface during short-flotation processes. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据