4.6 Article

Increased mortality among people with anxiety disorders. total population study

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 209, 期 3, 页码 216-221

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.171975

关键词

-

资金

  1. Lundbeck Foundation, within Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research, iPSYCH
  2. Mental Health in Primary Care (MEPRICA)
  3. Mental Health Services, Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark
  4. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  5. Lundbeck Foundation, within Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research, iPSYCH
  6. Mental Health in Primary Care (MEPRICA)
  7. Mental Health Services, Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark
  8. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  9. Lundbeck Foundation [R155-2012-11280, R155-2014-1724] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Anxiety disorders and depression are the most common mental disorders worldwide and have a striking impact on global disease burden. Although depression has consistently been found to increase mortality; the role of anxiety disorders in predicting mortality risk is unclear. Aims To assess mortality risk in people with anxiety disorders. Method We used nationwide Danish register data to conduct a prospective cohort study with over 30 million person-years of follow-up. Results In total, 1066 (2.1%) people with anxiety disorders died during an average follow-up of 9.7 years. The risk of death by natural and unnatural causes was significantly higher among individuals with anxiety disorders (natural mortality rate ratio (MRR)=1.39, 95% CI 1.28-1.51; unnatural MRR=2.46, 95% CI 2.20-2.73) compared with the general population. Of those who died from unnatural causes, 16.5% had comorbid diagnoses of depression (MRR=11.72, 95% CI 10.11-13.51). Conclusions Anxiety disorders significantly increased mortality risk. Comorbidity of anxiety disorders and depression played an important part in the increased mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据