4.7 Article

Intercalation pseudo-capacitance behavior of few-layered molybdenum sulfide in various electrolytes

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 561, 期 -, 页码 117-126

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.11.107

关键词

Few-layered MoS2; CTAB; Ion intercalation; Pseudo capacitance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21574076, 61804091, U1510121, 21501113, 21602127]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi province [2015021129]
  3. Fund for Shanxi 1331 Project Key Innovation Team [TD201704]
  4. Engineering Research Center [PT201807]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The insertion and de-insertion of ions in layered materials are important processes during the energy storage. The investigation on the preparation and electrochemical properties of layered materials attracts a lot of attention. Here, few-layered MoS2 nanosheets are prepared by solvothermally treating ammonium tetrathiomolybdate ((NH4)(2)MOS4) in the presence of hydrazine and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). The structure and electrochemical properties of few-layered MoS2 have been characterized and explored in detail. The results show that ions intercalation causes an interlayer spacing change of the obtained MoS2, and that the prepared few-layered MoS2 exhibits fairly good specific capacitance (330.8 F g(-1) at 2.0 A g(-1)), a high rate capability (specific capacitance can still retain 256 F g(-1) at 40 A g(-1)) and good cycle stability (capacitance can retain 88.8 % over 5000 cycles). Furthermore, different from most of the current literatures in which MoS2's capacitance is generally attributed to electric double-layer capacitance, the relationships between current responses and scan rates uncover that few-layered MoS2's capacitance mainly comes from intercalation pseudo capacitance. The result of this work predicts that few layered-MoS2 can be developed as a promising electrode material for energy storage. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据