4.8 Article

Neuromuscular junctions are stable in patients with cancer cachexia

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 130, 期 3, 页码 1461-1465

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI128411

关键词

-

资金

  1. Anatomical Society
  2. Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. NRS Clinician Post - Chief Scientist Office
  5. BBSRC [ISPG/5 12-17, ISPG/1 18-22]
  6. RCSEd
  7. BBSRC [BBS/E/D/10002071, BBS/E/D/20251969] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer cachexia is a major cause of patient morbidity and mortality, with no efficacious treatment or management strategy. Despite cachexia sharing pathophysiological features with a number of neuromuscular wasting conditions, including age-related sarcopenia, the mechanisms underlying cachexia remain poorly understood. Studies of related conditions suggest that pathological targeting of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) may play a key role in cachexia, but this has yet to be investigated in human patients. Here, high-resolution morphological analyses were undertaken on NMJs of rectus abdominis obtained from patients undergoing upper GI cancer surgery compared with controls (N = 30; n = 1,165 NMJs). Cancer patients included those with cachexia and weight-stable disease. Despite the low skeletal muscle index and significant muscle fiber atrophy (P < 0.0001) in patients with cachexia, NMJ morphology was fully conserved. No significant differences were observed in any of the pre- and postsynaptic variables measured. We conclude that NMJs remain structurally intact in rectus abdominis in both cancer and cachexia, suggesting that denervation of skeletal muscle is not a major driver of pathogenesis. The absence of NMJ pathology is in stark contrast to what is found in related conditions, such as age-related sarcopenia, and supports the hypothesis that intrinsic changes within skeletal muscle, independent of any changes in motor neurons, represent the primary locus of neuromuscular pathology in cancer cachexia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据