4.8 Article

Selective induction of antibody effector functional responses using MF59-adjuvanted vaccination

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 130, 期 2, 页码 662-672

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI129520

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ragon Institute
  2. Samana Cay Massachusetts General Hospital scholar program
  3. NIH [AI080289 (5R37AI080289-09), AI102660-01 (5R01AI102660-04, AI129797-01 (1R01A1129797-01), T32 AI007245]
  4. Harvard CFAR [P30 AI060354-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seasonal and pandemic influenza infection remains a major public health concern worldwide. Driving robust humoral immunity has been a challenge given preexisting, often cross-reactive, immunity and in particular, poorly immunogenic avian antigens. To overcome immune barriers, the adjuvant MF59 has been used in seasonal influenza vaccines to increase antibody titers and improve neutralizing activity, translating to a moderate increase in protection in vulnerable populations. However, its effects on stimulating antibody effector functions, including NK cell activation, monocyte phagocytosis, and complement activity, all of which have been implicated in protection against influenza, have yet to be defined, Using systems serology, we assessed changes in antibody functional profiles in individuals who received H5N1 avian influenza vaccine administered with MF59, with alum, or delivered unadjuvanted. MF59 elicited antibody responses that stimulated robust neutrophil phagocytosis and complement activity. Conversely, vaccination with MF59 recruited NK cells poorly and drove moderate monocyte phagocytic activity, both likely compromised because of the induction of antibodies that did not bind FCGR3A. Collectively, defining the humoral antibody functions induced by distinct adjuvants may provide a path to designing next-generation vaccines that can selectively leverage the humoral immune functions, beyond binding and neutralization, resulting in better protection from infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据