4.3 Article

Patient perceptions of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring testing, tolerability, accessibility, and expense

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 16-20

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jch.13760

关键词

ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; diagnostic testing; patient reported outcomes; survey

资金

  1. Government of Alberta
  2. University of Alberta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is strongly endorsed by contemporary hypertension guidelines. The objective of this study was to assess patient perceptions of ambulatory blood pressure testing, tolerability, accessibility, and expense. A convenience sample of 50, consenting patients undergoing ambulatory blood pressure monitoring at the University of Alberta Hypertension Clinic in Edmonton, Canada was studied. A 16-item structured questionnaire was administered in person or electronically. Questions regarding the tolerability of ambulatory monitoring were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale and wait times, expenditures, and willingness to pay were evaluated by direct questioning. Mean age was 53.1 +/- 15.4 years, 32 (64%) were female, and 23 (46%) were employed. Mean 24-hour ambulatory BP was 134 +/- 12/79 +/- 8 mmHg. Ambulatory monitoring caused discomfort in 40 (80%) patients and disturbed sleep in 39 (78%). Forty-one (82%) patients perceived that the home (vs pharmacy, primary care clinic, and speciality care clinic) would be the easiest venue to access future testing. On average, patients waited 27.3 +/- 23.7 days for testing; they felt that a wait time of 21.3 +/- 12.3 days was appropriate. Mean time taken off work was 8.6 +/- 10.8 hours. Twelve (24%) patients indicated that they would be willing to pay out-of-pocket to undergo testing sooner, at a mean expenditure of $120 +/- 69. Nineteen (62%) patients were willing to buy a monitor and felt that a mean purchase cost of $125 +/- 89 was appropriate. These findings extend current knowledge of patient perceptions of ambulatory monitoring and may help to refine and optimize future delivery of this essential test.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据