4.7 Article

Ten Years of Very Infrequent Zoledronate Therapy in Older Women: An Open-Label Extension of a Randomized Trial

期刊

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa062

关键词

zoledronate; bone density; osteoporosis; biochemical markers of bone turnover

资金

  1. Health Research Council (HRC) of New Zealand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Intravenous zoledronate prevents bone loss and reduces fracture risk in older adults but the optimal dosing strategy required to achieve each outcome is not known. Objective: To assess the effect of very infrequent zoledronate therapy on bone mineral density (BMD) and markers of bone turnover. Design and participants: An average of 5.5 years after randomization to either a single dose of 5 mg of zoledronateor placebo, 33 of the original cohort of 50 older women with osteopenia entered a 5-year open-label extension study. Setting: Academic research center Intervention: A 5-mg dose of intravenous zoledronate was administered to all participants. Main outcome measures: BMD and bone turnover were measured annually, generating data over almost 11 years in women who received 5 mg of zoledronate at 0 and 5.5 years (ZZ, n = 16), or placebo at baseline and 5 mg of zoledronate at 5.5 years (PZ, n = 17). Results: After redosing, BMD in ZZ remained stable, while BMD in PZ increased. At 11 years, changes from baseline BMD in ZZ and PZ were 3.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1,6.5) and 2.9% (0.3,5.5) at the lumbar spine (P =.61), 0.9% (-1.7,3.5) and -2.8% (-5.3,-0.3) at the total hip (P =.006), and 0.4% (-0.8,1.6) and -0.4% (-1.3,0.5) at the total body (P =.14). Bone turnover markers were similar in the PZ and ZZ groups throughout the 5 years after redosing. Conclusions: These results suggest that zoledronate 5 mg administered at a 5.5-year interval prevents bone loss over almost 11 years. Clinical trials to investigate whether very infrequent treatment with zoledronate reduces fracture risk are justified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据