4.7 Review

Risk for Infections During Treatment With Denosumab for Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

期刊

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgz322

关键词

osteoporosis; denosumab; anti RANK ligand; adverse events; meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Denosumab inhibits the receptor activator of nuclear factor.-. ligand, an immune system modulator. Safety endpoints including risk for infections were assessed as secondary outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the drug. Objective: To assess the risk of serious adverse events of infections (SAEI) in denosumab-treated patients. Data Sources: PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to May 27, 2019. Study Selection: All RCTs of denosumab (60 mg every 6 months) versus any comparator were included. We excluded trials in cancer patients for prevention of skeletal-related events. Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria and extracted the data. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a fixed effect model. Sensitivity analysis was based on risk of bias. Data Synthesis: Thirty-three studies (22 253 patients) were included. There was a higher incidence of SAEI during denosumab treatment versus any comparator (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.041.40; I-2 = 0%), mainly of ear, nose, and throat (RR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.20-5.91) and gastrointestinal origin (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.02-2.01). RR was similar in a sensitivity analysis based on adequate allocation concealment. The RR of any infection (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.99-1.06) and infection-related mortality (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.20-1.23) was comparable between groups. Conclusions: A higher incidence of SAEI is demonstrated during treatment with denosumab in an osteoporosis dose. Nevertheless, the overall risk for any infection or related mortality is similar to comparator groups. These findings merit consideration before therapy initiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据