4.7 Article

Strategizing the relation between urbanization and air pollution: Empirical evidence from global countries

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 243, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118615

关键词

PM2.5 concentrations; Urbanization; Income level; Panel data model; Global countries

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [19lgzd09]
  2. Guangdong Special Support Program
  3. Pearl River S&T Nova Program of Guangzhou [201806010187]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While urbanization has boosted the global economy, it is putting increasing pressure on air quality. Previous studies on the link between urbanization and air pollution have tended to focus on individual aspects of urbanization. In addition, research into the global scale has been scarce. This study constructed an urbanization index system integrating demographic, spatial, economic, and social components and divided 190 countries into 4 subpanels according to the national income levels, in order to identify the heterogeneity effects of urbanization on PM2.5 pollutants for the period 1998-2014 from a global perspective. The results of the panel regression models prove that the effect of urbanization on atmospheric contamination varied significantly across the income-based subpanels. The model analysis shows that demographic urbanization has a significant positive effect on PM2.5 concentrations in all subpanels. Spatial urbanization had exerted a negative effect on air pollution in high-income countries and a positive influence on air pollution in other countries. Social urbanization, in contrast, presented the opposite trend. Additionally, the model analysis shows that the economic urbanization in upper-middle-income and high-income groups can effectively alleviate PM2.5 pollutants. This study indicated that the level of development needs to be taken into account when government policy makers formulate targeted measures to control haze and improve air quality. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据