4.7 Article

Sustainability efficiency assessment of wastewater treatment plants in China: A data envelopment analysis based on cluster benchmarking

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 244, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118729

关键词

Efficiency assessment; Data envelopment analysis; Cluster benchmarking; Sustainability; Wastewater treatment plant; Slack based measure

资金

  1. Major Science and Technology Program of China for Water Pollution Control and Treatment from Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2017ZX07204001]
  2. Participation in Research Program from Shanghai Jiao Tong University [T160PRP35015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantitative evaluation on the efficiency of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is a key issue that needs to be solved. For this purpose, data envelopment analysis (DEA) was employed to establish a comprehensive efficiency evaluation system on WWTPs, including three inputs of operating cost, electricity consumption and labor, three desirable outputs of chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal rate, ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) removal rate and reclaimed water yield, and one undesirable output of dry sludge yield. 861 WWTPs in China were assessed by a slacked-based DEA model based on cluster benchmarking. The technology gap ratio (TGR) confirmed that large WWTPs operated more efficiently than small ones. The WWTPs had an average efficiency score of 0.611. Among them, 170 samples were relatively efficient with a score of 1, which means these samples could be a benchmark for other inefficient samples. Different degrees of input excesses or output shortfalls existed in 691 inefficient samples and these samples should be the key objects to improve the operational efficiency. Furthermore, through the Kruskal-Wallis test, the influent COD concentration and capacity load rate showed significant effects on the WWTP performance. These findings, derived from a simple but effective framework, have potential value for managers to make decisions. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据