4.7 Article

Understanding the causal influence of major meteorological factors on ground ozone concentrations across China

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 242, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118498

关键词

Ozone; Meteorological factors; Casual influence; CCM; China

资金

  1. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology [2017-KF-22]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41601447]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To comprehensively understand meteorological drivers for the soaring ozone pollution across China, an advanced causality analysis model, Convergent Cross Mapping (CCM) was employed to investigate the causal influence of major individual meteorological factors on ground ozone concentrations in 184 monitoring cities. Meteorological influences on O-3_1h and O-3_8h were generally consistent. For most mega cities, temperature, humidity and sunshine duration (SSD) exerted a major influence on ground ozone concentrations in all seasons. Specifically, temperature was the most important meteorological factor for ground ozone concentrations across China. From the perspective of influence direction, temperature, SSD and evaporation exerted a consistent positive influence whilst humidity and precipitation exerted a consistent negative influence on ground ozone concentrations in most cities. On the other hand, the influence direction of wind speed, wind direction and air pressure varied significantly. Based on multi-year comparison, meteorological influences on ground ozone concentrations were generally consistent, and soaring ozone concentrations across China in 2017 could be mainly attributed to the notable change of meteorological conditions in 2017, characterized with rising temperature and SSD and decreasing humidity. Consequently, meteorological means such as wind-corridors and artificial precipitation can be a promising approach for mitigating seasonal and short-term ozone pollution. (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据