4.7 Article

Pretreatment of swine manure containing β-lactam antibiotics with whole-cell biocatalyst to improve biogas production

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 240, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118070

关键词

Cell surface display; Whole-cell biocatalyst; beta-Lactam antibiotics; Degradation; Anaerobic digestion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31870082]
  2. Gansu province major science and technology projects [17ZD2WA017]
  3. College of life science, Lanzhou University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biogas is one of the most popular renewable alternatives. Large quantities of antibiotics are used for rearing livestock resulting in the presence of high levels of antibiotics in manure, inhibiting biogas production during anaerobic digestion. In this study, a novel whole-cell biocatalyst that can accelerate degradation of antibiotics was developed by displaying beta-lactamase on the cell surface of Escherichia coli. This biocatalyst showed high enzyme activity (4.93 +/- 0.77 U/g dry weight of cells) in degrading beta-lactam antibiotics and higher stability at room temperature than free beta-lactamase. Penicillin, cefamezin, and amoxicillin were completely degraded in solution by the biocatalyst within 1 h. Pretreatment of swine manure containing 50 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg of penicillin, cefamezin, and amoxicillin with the new biocatalyst enhanced methane production by 37.1% and 93.2%, respectively during anaerobic digestion. The engineered biocatalyst protected the microbial community from antibiotic inhibition and hence is conducive for the growth of methanogens. This new strategy eliminates the inhibiting effects of antibiotics on manure, increasing the methane production and therefore achieving maximum utilization of renewable energy during anaerobic digestion. This pretreatment technology provides a new idea to treat manure containing antibiotics and improve energy efficiency. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据