4.7 Review

New aspects of p66Shc in ischaemia reperfusion injury and other cardiovascular diseases

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 174, 期 12, 页码 1690-1703

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bph.13478

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundations [Schu 843/9-1]
  2. CARIPARO Foundation (Progetti di Eccellenza)
  3. Progetto Strategico Dycendi of the University of Padova
  4. European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes
  5. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [OTKA K 109737, OTKA ANN 107803]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although reactive oxygen species (ROS) act as crucial factors in the onset and progression of a wide array of diseases, they are also involved in numerous signalling pathways related to cell metabolism, growth and survival. ROS are produced at various cellular sites, and it is generally agreed that mitochondria generate the largest amount, especially those in cardiomyocytes. However, the identification of the most relevant sites within mitochondria, the interaction among the various sources, and the events responsible for the increase in ROS formation under pathological conditions are still highly debated, and far from being clarified. Here, we review the information linking the adaptor protein p66Shc with cardiac injury induced by ischaemia and reperfusion (I/R), including the contribution of risk factors, such as metabolic syndrome and ageing. In response to several stimuli, p66Shc migrates into mitochondria where it catalyses electron transfer from cytochrome c to oxygen resulting in hydrogen peroxide formation. Deletion of p66Shc has been shown to reduce I/R injury as well as vascular abnormalities associated with diabetes and ageing. However, p66Shc-induced ROS formation is also involved in insulin signalling and might contribute to self-endogenous defenses against mild I/R injury. In addition to its role in physiological and pathological conditions, we discuss compounds and conditions that can modulate the expression and activity of p66Shc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据