4.6 Article

Cationic polyelectrolyte/graphene oxide as an efficient sorbent for the extraction and analysis of trace acidic herbicides in vegetables

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1618, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.460884

关键词

Cationic polyelectrolyte; Graphene oxide; Acidic herbicide; Matrix effect; Solid-phase extraction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31901766, 81703228]
  2. Talents of High Level Scientific Research Foundation
  3. Qingdao Agricultural University [665-1119014]
  4. Breeding Plan of Shandong Provincial Qingchuang Research Team (2019)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The facile preparation and characterization of a cationic polyelectrolyte (polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride, PDDA) fabricated graphene oxide-grafted silica microsphere (PDDA@GO@Sil) with high positive charge density as the sorbent for the high selective capture of acidic herbicides were reported. The theoretical calculation showed that there were strong adsorption energies between the PDDA and analytes, and the main interaction was the hydrogen bonding from O-H center dot center dot center dot Cl and C=O center dot center dot center dot H-C. Static- and dynamic-state adsorption results indicated that acidic herbicides were the monolayer coverage onto the PDDA@GO@Sil due to the electrostatic attraction between the sorbent and analytes, and electrostatic repulsion among analytes. Under the optimized conditions obtained with the single-factor experiment and response surface methodology, this established method was used for the enrichment and determination of herbicides in two vegetables. Method detection limits were in the range of 0.75-1.50 mu g L-1 indicating that the introduction of PDDA provided the excellent extraction capacity toward acidic herbicides. The obtained results exhibited that the developed method was feasible, reliable, selective and accurate for the determination of acidic herbicides in real samples. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据