4.5 Article

Enhancement of visible-light photocatalytic degradation performance over nitrogen-deficient g-C3N4/KNbO3 heterojunction photocatalyst

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.6338

关键词

KNbO3; nitrogen-deficient g-C3N4; photocatalysis; heterojunction; visible-light

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [21906072]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20190982]
  3. Zhangjiagang Science and Technology Support Program (Social Development) of Jiangsu Province, China [ZKS1510]
  4. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (China) [KYCX19_1677, KYCX19_1706, SJKY19_2629, SJKY19_2658]
  5. Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology (China) [1062931806, 1142931803]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND The formation of heterojunction is an effective mean for increasing the photocatalytic activity of single-phase semiconductor photocatalyst. RESULTS In this report, KNbO3/N-defected g-C3N4 (KNO/CNx) composites were prepared by an impregnation heat method. The optimized photocatalyst 3% KNO/CNx possesses excellent photocatalytic activity (100 mL, 10 mg/L; 84% degradation within 120 min) in the degradation of tetracycline (TC) under visible light (lambda > 420 nm), and it can reach about 125, 10.71 and 3.75 times the degradation kinetic constants, compared with KNO, CN, and CNx, respectively. Furthermore, 3% KNO/CNx possesses relatively high stability during the entire photoreaction process. CONCLUSION This enhanced photocatalytic activity of KNO/CNx is mainly ascribed to the synergistic effect between the heterojunction and defect engineering, which expand the visible-light adsorption and accelerate the separation efficiency of photo-induced electron-hole pairs. The research is expected to be used to improve the structure and properties of KNO-based composites, which provides a possibility for practical application of environmental restoration. (c) 2020 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据