4.7 Article

Intramolecular hydrogen bonding protects the hydroxyl group from attack by fluctuating solvent forces

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 152, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.5143572

关键词

-

资金

  1. Israel Science Foundation [1118/15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrafast spectroscopy of molecular systems involving hydrogen- (H-) bonding has been at the forefront of fundamental chemical and physical research for several decades. Among the spectroscopic observables of the ultrafast dynamics is the pure dephasing of vibrationally excited molecules. Using third-order nonlinear vibrational spectroscopy, including polarization-selective transient grating measurements of vibrational lifetime and orientational diffusion as well as two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy, we determined different individual line shape components of hydroxyl stretching (nu OH) excitations in a homologous series of chlorophenols and obtained the corresponding pure dephasing rates. The pure dephasing rates are correlated with vibrational anharmonicity of the nu OH mode, which is tuned remotely from the hydroxyl site by changing the position of the chlorine substituents on the phenol ring. We found that in molecules where the hydroxyl group is in its free form, the pure dephasing rates scale linearly with the mode's anharmonicity such that assuming it is dominated by the third-order diagonal term, the ultrafast dynamics follow the prediction of the Kubo-Oxtoby theory. However, in the intramolecularly H-bonded ortho-chlorophenols, this trend is reversed, and the pure dephasing slows down by similar to 50% for an increase in anharmonicity of only a few wavenumbers. Because the nu OH mode's anharmonicity is known to reflect the H-bonding strength, our results suggest that intramolecular H-bonding can serve as a mechanism of protection from fluctuating forces exerted by the solvent. Such an effect can be relevant for ultrafast dynamics in biomolecules, where H-bonding plays a central role.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据