4.7 Article

Influence of thermostatting on nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations of heat conduction in solids

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 151, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5132543

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11502217, 11804242, 51676121, 11974059]
  2. Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation [BK20160308]
  3. Academy of Finland Centre of Excellence program QTF [312298]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nonequiibrium molecular dynamics (NEMD) has been extensively used to study thermal transport at various length scales in many materials. In this method, two local thermostats at different temperatures are used to generate a nonequilibrium steady state with a constant heat flux. Conventionally, the thermal conductivity of a finite system is calculated as the ratio between the heat flux and the temperature gradient extracted from the linear part of the temperature profile away from the local thermostats. Here, we show that, with a proper choice of the thermostat, the nonlinear part of the temperature profile should actually not be excluded in thermal transport calculations. We compare NEMD results against those from the atomistic Green's function method in the ballistic regime and those from the homogeneous nonequilibrium molecular dynamics method in the ballistic-to-diffusive regime. These comparisons suggest that in all the transport regimes, one should directly calculate the thermal conductance from the temperature difference between the heat source and sink and, if needed, convert it into the thermal conductivity by multiplying it with the system length. Furthermore, we find that the Langevin thermostat outperforms the Nose-Hoover (chain) thermostat in NEMD simulations because of its stochastic and local nature. We show that this is particularly important for studying asymmetric carbon-based nanostructures, for which the Nose-Hoover thermostat can produce artifacts leading to unphysical thermal rectification. Published under license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据