4.5 Article

Applying a Chemical Structure Teaching Method in the Pharmaceutical Analysis Curriculum to Improve Student Engagement and Learning

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION
卷 97, 期 2, 页码 421-426

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00551

关键词

Upper-Division Undergraduate; Collaborative/Cooperative Learning; Drugs/Pharmaceuticals; Curriculum

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [CE140100003, DE150100169]
  2. Second Batch of Collaborative Projects of Ministry of Education of China [201802066080]
  3. Australian Research Council [DE150100169] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pharmaceutical analysis, as the core curriculum of chemistry, chemical engineering, and pharmaceutical engineering, contains broad and in-depth knowledge that leads to massive learning and teaching loads. There are more than 100 analytical methods of medicines in this course. As such, this subject is a big challenge for both students and lecturers. A novel chemical structure teaching (CST) method was developed on the basis of our long-term teaching experience to cope with these challenges. It has been shown in practice that this CST method can significantly unload the stress of students and lecturers simultaneously. The survey about the improvement of students' interests was carried out and listed in the form of questionnaire. The outcome of CST indicates that it can help students to form abilities of critical and logical thinking, motivate them to discuss with their peers and lecturers, and eventually improve comprehensive abilities such as synthesizing information, thinking logically, and analyzing problems independently as well as the average score. Furthermore, CST can be beneficial for lecturers who teach other relevant curricula in chemical or pharmaceutical engineering to improve the teaching outcome, such as organic chemistry, spectrum analysis, pharmaceutical synthesis, and medicinal chemistry. This CST model can also help students cultivate a life-long learning ability as active learners from the cognitive perspective view.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据