4.5 Article

Contributions of individual and combined Glu-B1x and Glu-B1y high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits to semolina functionality and pasta quality

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
卷 93, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2020.102943

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2017-67007-25939]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  3. China Scholarship Council
  4. USDA-ARS CRIS Project [2030-21430-014D]
  5. NIFA [914501, 2017-67007-25939] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Durum wheat is an important food crop used primarily for pasta production. High-molecular-weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS) encoded by the closely linked genes Glu-B1x and Glu-B1y are known for their combined effects on pasta quality, but their individual contributions and interactions remain poorly understood. In this study, we show that individual loss-of-function mutants of Glu-B1x (Delta Bx6) and Glu-B1y (Delta By8) were associated with significant reductions in gluten strength compared to the wildtype, with stronger effects in the Delta Bxy double mutant. Reductions in gluten strength were reflected in reduced mixograph and alveograph parameters, gluten index, faster extrusion flow rates and increased cooking loss. Interestingly, the Glu-B1x mutation was also associated with significant increases in grain and semolina protein content, increased pasta firmness, reduced starch viscosity and increased amylose in Delta Bx6 and Delta Bxy. In general, the Delta Bx6 mutation had stronger effects than the Delta By8 mutation, and significant interactions between the two genes were frequent. In addition to the basic knowledge gained on the individual effects of the Bx6 and By8 subunits and their interactions, the genetic stocks developed in this study provide useful tools to study the effects of natural or synthetic HMW-GS on pasta quality parameters in a background lacking endogenous HMW-GS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据