4.5 Article

Recycling endosomes attach to the trans-side of Golgi stacks in Drosophila and mammalian cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 133, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.236935

关键词

Recycling endosomes; Trans-Golgi network; TGN

资金

  1. Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology [25-J-J4215]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, KAKENHI [15K07050]
  3. Sumitomo Foundation for Basic Science Research Projects
  4. Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders and Female Researcher Joint Research Grant from Hiroshima University
  5. KAKENHI [25221103, 17H06420, 18H05275, 19K06566]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K06566, 18H05275, 15K07050, 17H06420] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Historically, the trans-Golgi network (TGN) has been recognized as a sorting center of newly synthesized proteins, whereas the recycling endosome (RE) is a compartment where endocytosed materials transit before being recycled to the plasma membrane. However, recent findings revealed that both the TGN and RE connect endocytosis and exocytosis and, thus, are functionally overlapping. Here we report, in both Drosophila and microtubule-disrupted HeLa cells, that REs are interconvertible between two distinct states, namely Golgi-associated REs and free REs. Detachment and reattachment of REs and Golgi stacks are often observed, and newly synthesized glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored cargo protein but not vesicular stomatitis virusGproteinis transported through these two types ofRE. In plants, there are two types of TGN - Golgi-associated TGN and Golgi-independent TGN. We show that dynamics of REs in both Drosophila and mammalian cells are very similar compared with those of plant TGNs. And, togetherwiththe similarityon the molecular level, our results indicate that fly and mammalian REs are organelles that are equivalent to TGNs in plants. This suggests that the identities and functional relationships between REs and TGNs should be reconsidered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据