4.2 Article

Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Shock States

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1074248419892603

关键词

remote ischemic conditioning; remote ischemic preconditioning; remote ischemic perconditioning; myocardial infarct size; ischemia; reperfusion injury; ST-elevation myocardial infarction; hemorrhagic shock; septic shock; cardiogenic shock

资金

  1. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, through the Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program [W81XWH-16-1-0606]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Remote ischemic conditioning is the phenomenon whereby brief, nonlethal episodes of ischemia in one organ (such as a limb) protect a remote organ from ischemic necrosis induced by a longer duration of severe ischemia followed by reperfusion. This phenomenon has been reproduced by dozens of experimental laboratories and was shown to reduce the size of myocardial infarction in many but not all clinical studies. In one recent large clinical trial, remote ischemic conditioning induced by repetitive blood pressure cuff inflations on the arm did not reduce infarct size or improve clinical outcomes. This negative result may have been related in part to the overall success of early reperfusion and current adjunctive therapies, such as antiplatelet therapy, antiremodeling therapies, and low-risk patients, that may make it difficult to show any advantage of newer adjunctive therapies on top of existing therapies. One relevant area in which current outcomes are not as positive as in the treatment of heart attack is the treatment of shock, where mortality rates remain high. Recent experimental studies show that remote ischemic conditioning may improve survival and organ function in shock states, especially hemorrhagic shock and septic shock. In this study, we review the preclinical studies that have explored the potential benefit of this therapy for shock states and describe an ongoing clinical study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据