4.5 Article

Growth and lipid production of Rhodotorula glutinis R4, in comparison to other oleaginous yeasts

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 310, 期 -, 页码 21-31

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2020.01.012

关键词

Rhodotorula; Microbial lipids; Single cell oils; Biodiesel; Oleaginous yeast; Antarctica; Third generation biodiesel

资金

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica, FONCYT [PICT2013-1154, PICT2016-3083, PICT2013-2016, PICT2013-1686, PICT2015-1207, PICT2018-1370]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas CONICET [PUE-2016-0012, PIP0677-2015]
  3. Secretaria de Ciencia, Arte e Innovacion Tecnologica de la Universidad Nacional de Tucuman, SCAIT-UNT [PIUNT D509, PIUNT D605]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some Rhodotorula spp. have been characterized as oleaginous yeasts. Under certain culture conditions they can accumulate neutral lipids, which are mainly triglycerides (TAG). Microbial TAG that can be used as raw material for biodiesel synthesis are attractive for the biofuel industry. In this study, the ability to synthesize lipids of Rhodotorula glutinis R4, isolated in Antarctica, was compared with eight strains belonging to the genera Rhodotorula and Yarrowia with the aim of proposing a novel source of oils for biodiesel synthesis. All strains were cultured under nitrogen (N) limiting conditions and an excess of carbon (C) in the culture medium. We found that yeasts accumulated between 9-48.9 % (w/w) of lipids. Among them, R. glutinis R4 showed the highest growth (14 g L-1, mu max 0,092 h(-1)) and lipid production (7 g L-1; 47 % w/w). Microbial oils produced by R. glutinis R4 are similar to vegetable oils, with 61 % of oleic acid, indicating that it is adequate for biodiesel synthesis. Our results demonstrate that biodiesel derived from R. glutinis R4 complies with international fuel standards ASTM D6751 and EN 14214. Therefore, this work demonstrates that Rhodotorula glutinis R4 is a novel and valuable source of microbial oils for biodiesel synthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据