4.5 Review

Reactive oxygen species detection-approaches in plants: Insights into genetically encoded FRET-based sensors

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 308, 期 -, 页码 108-117

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.12.003

关键词

Abiotic stress; Reactive oxygen species; ROS-detection; Non-invasive approaches; FRET

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Govt. of India [BT/HRD/35//02/2006, BT/RLF/Re-Entry/18/2015]
  2. Junior Research Fellowship of Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Govt. of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (and their reaction products) in abiotic stressed plants can be simultaneous. Hence, it is very difficult to establish individual roles of ROS (and their reaction products) in plants particularly under abiotic stress conditions. It is highly imperative to detect ROS (and their reaction products) and ascertain their role in vivo and also to point their optimal level in order to unveil exact relation of ROS (and their reaction products) with the major components of ROS-controlling systems. Forster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) technology enables us with high potential for monitoring and quantification of ROS and redox variations, avoiding some of the obstacles presented by small-molecule fluorescent dyes. This paper aims to: (i) introduce ROS and overview ROS-chemistry and ROS-accrued major damages to major biomolecules; (ii) highlight invasive and non-invasive approaches for the detection of ROS (and their reaction products); (iii) appraise literature available on genetically encoded ROS (and their reaction products)-sensors based on FRET technology, and (iv) enlighten so far unexplored aspects in the current context. The studies integrating the outcomes of the FRET-based ROS-detection approaches with OMICS sciences (genetics, genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) would enlighten major insights into real-time ROS and redox dynamics, and their signaling at cellular and subcellular levels in living cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据