4.7 Article

Potential of graphene oxide as a drug delivery system for Sumatriptan: a detailed density functional theory study

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 1611-1620

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1736161

关键词

Drug delivery; surface interaction; sumatriptan; graphene oxide; density functional theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that graphene oxide can interact strongly with Sumatriptan drug, mainly through the interaction between the hydrogen atoms of the drug and the oxygen atoms of graphene oxide. The adsorption energy values obtained through density functional theory calculations suggest that graphene oxide may serve as a potential carrier or sensor for Sumatriptan drug.
The adsorption property of Sumatriptan drug onto graphene oxide (GO) was studied using density functional theory (DFT) calculations. All possible initial positions of drug adsorption were considered to find out which one is energetically favorable. According to the achieved findings, the stronger interactions occurred between the positively polarized parts of the Sumatriptan (i.e. hydrogen atoms of the-OH and -NH parts) and negatively polarized oxygen atoms of the GO. The presence of non-covalent interactions of GO and Sumatriptan was confirmed based on the determined geometrical parameters, electronic structure analysis results, and adsorption energies. Different parameters such as frontier molecular orbital (FMO), natural bond orbital (NBO), dipole moment, and solation energy were investigated. Global indices such as hardness, softness, chemical potential, and electrophilicity of all systems were calculated and compared. The adsorption energy values were determined within the range of -8.39 to -10.59 kcal/mol (-1.87 to -5.67 BSSE corrected) in the water solvent for different adsorption geometries. The obtained results show that GO can act as a promising carrier/sensor for Sumatriptan drug in practical application. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据