4.5 Article

Sustained-immunostimulatory nanocellulose scaffold to enhance vaccine efficacy

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
卷 108, 期 5, 页码 1159-1170

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36890

关键词

drug delivery; hydrogel; immune scaffold; nanocellulose; vaccine

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [JP 18lm0203023]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [16H04524, 18K14099]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H04524, 18K14099] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An implantable scaffold-based vaccination system is a promising platform to generate robust immune responses by modulating the immune system. However, establishment of an effective vaccine using a biodegradable, cell-infiltrative scaffold remain challenging. Here we demonstrate a biodegradable, nanocellulose-based immune scaffold capable of sustainably activating immune cells to elicit cellular immunity. Cell-infiltrative nanocellulose hydrogels were used as a delivery carrier and cellular scaffold microenvironment. Nanofibrous hydrogels allowed for high cell infiltration and delivery of antigen-loaded nanocellulose while cells degraded the hydrogel matrix. Importantly, antigen-loaded nanocellulose hydrogels exhibited sustained activation of macrophages in vitro compared to free antigen and collagen scaffold. Histological observation revealed infiltration of macrophages and dendritic cells into the nanocellulose scaffold subcutaneously implanted in mice. In vivo fluorescence imaging indicated that the implanted scaffold released antigens at a zero-order release profile without burst diffusion. Antigen-loaded nanocellulose hydrogels increased interferon-gamma-producing cells compared to free antigen injection, suggesting the enhancement of cellular immunity. Thus, nanocellulose immune scaffold may serve as a sustained-immunostimulatory vaccine platform by providing favorable microenvironments for immune cells thus enhancing vaccine efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据