4.7 Review

Safety of high-dose ivermectin: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 75, 期 4, 页码 827-834

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkz524

关键词

-

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health 'Fondi Ricerca Corrente - Linea 2, progetto 4'

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Ivermectin is a key anthelmintic for the control of neglected tropical diseases. The main indications for population-Level control with ivermectin through mass drug administration are onchocerciasis and Lymphatic filariasis; however, there is interest in using higher, fixed-dose regimens for the control of scabies, soil-transmitted helminths and malaria. Safety data for these higher-dose regimens are needed. Methods: A systematic Literature review and meta-analysis on the safety and doses of ivermectin was conducted. Eligible studies reported patient-Level data and, for the meta-analysis, clinical trials reporting data on doses >= 200 and >= 400 mu g/kg were included. Incidence ratios were used to compare adverse events by severity and organ system affected. Results: The systematic search identified six studies for inclusion, revealing no differences in the number of individuals experiencing adverse events. A descriptive analysis of these clinical trials for a variety of indications showed no difference in the severity of the adverse events between standard (up to 400 mu g/kg) and higher doses of ivermectin. Organ system involvement only showed an increase in ocular events in the higher-dose group in one trial for the treatment of onchocerciasis, all of them transient and mild to moderate in intensity. Conclusions: Although within this review the safety of high-dose ivermectin appears to be comparable to standard doses, there are not enough data to support a recommendation for its use in higher-than-approved doses. Ocular adverse events, despite being transient, are of concern in onchocerciasis patients. These data can inform programme managers and guide operational research activities as new approaches for the use of ivermectin are evaluated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据