4.7 Article

Influence of nickel doping on the energy band gap, luminescence, and magnetic order of spray deposited nanostructured ZnO thin films

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 816, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152538

关键词

Ni doped ZnO; Ferromagnetism; XPS spectroscopy; Photoluminescence; Oxygen vacancies; sp-d exchange interaction

资金

  1. Kuwait University [GS 01/05, GS 03/01, GS02/01, GE01/08, GE01/07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We synthesized Ni doped ZnO thin films, ZnxNi1-xO (0.0 <= x <= 0.1), using spray pyrolysis deposition and performed a systematic study on their crystal structure, electronic, photoluminescent properties, and magnetic order. X-ray diffraction analysis showed that all nanostructured films under investigation are crystalized in a single phase wurtzite structure (space group P63mc), with a preferred orientation along (002) plane. The phase purity and the successful incorporation of Ni dopants into the ZnO lattice were also confirmed by the x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Ultra Violet-Visible, and Energy Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy measurements. The XPS results indicated that Ni ions are in 2 + oxidization state in all doped films. Photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy showed strong emission peak in the UV region and multi-components emission peak in the visible luminescence, which is ascribed to deep-level emissions by different types of intrinsic defect states. Both XPS and PL spectroscopy clearly showed significant enhancement in the oxygen vacancy (V-O) concentration by increasing the Ni doping. The saturation magnetization and coercivity also increase with Ni doping, indicating a strong correlation between the concentration of V-O defects, and the observed magnetic order in the doped films. In addition, a red shift in the energy gap is found with Ni doping and is attributed to the sp-d exchange interaction, which is mediated by the V-O defects in the ZnO lattice. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据