4.4 Article

Silencing CCNG1 protects MPC-5 cells from high glucose-induced proliferation-inhibition and apoptosis-promotion via MDM2/p53 signaling pathway

期刊

INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY
卷 52, 期 3, 页码 581-593

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02383-4

关键词

Diabetic nephropathy; CCNG1; MDM2; p53; High glucose

资金

  1. Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Department (Guizhou Provincial Intellectual Property Bureau) [Qiankehe LH [2017] 7183, Qiankehe SY [2011]3052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the most serious complications of diabetes mellitus and one of the most important causes of end-stage renal disease, but its pathogenesis has not been elucidated so far, and there is no effective treatment. Methods DN models of rats and MPC-5 cells were established with streptozotocin (STZ) and high glucose (HG) in vivo and in vitro, respectively. Cell markers desmin and nephrin in foot kidney tissue were detected by Western blot. CCNG1 level in vitro was analyzed by Western blot and immunohistochemistry. CCK-8 assay and flow cytometry were conducted to analyze the effect of CCNG1 on HG-treated MPC-5 cells. Apoptosis-related proteins (Bcl-2, Bax and p53), CCNG1, and MDM2 were determined by RT-qPCR and Western blot. Results The level of nephrin was decreased, while desmin was increased in STZ-induced DN rats and CCNG1 level was also enhanced by STZ. In vitro experiments indicated that MPC-5 cell viability was inhibited and apoptosis was induced by HG and we also found that CCNG1 expression was up-regulated by HG and negatively correlated with MDM2 level. The effects of HG on MPC-5 cell viability, apoptosis, and cell cycle were reversed by silencing CCNG1, but further deteriorated by overexpression of CCNG1. Furthermore, overexpression of MDM2 inhibited HG-induced MPC-5 cell injury and CCNG1 expression. Conclusions These findings revealed that down-regulation of CCNG1 has protection effects in DN that is mechanistically linked to MDM2-p53 pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据