4.7 Article

Modelling job rotation in manufacturing systems with aged workers

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 8, 页码 2522-2536

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1735659

关键词

job rotation; ergonomics; mathematical modelling; multi criteria decision making; Intelligent decision support systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a bi-objective mathematical model to assign workers to different workstations based on their abilities and workstation requirements, aiming to improve both efficiency and ergonomics.
The increasing trend of retirement age in Europe represents a critical phenomenon for manufacturing and material handling activities, where repetitive activities, involving the handling of different loads at various frequencies, are usually required. These tasks can lead to occupational diseases and work-related musculoskeletal disorders, which can affect more heavily older workers, due to their decreased functional and physical capacities. On the other side, older workers positively contribute to the manufacturing processes through their expertise and their skills developed over time. This paper introduces a bi-objective mathematical model useful to assign different workers exposed to the risk of repetitive work to various workstations. A person-job fit approach is proposed, which analyses the workers' physical capacities, competencies and mental and relational skills together with the requirements of each workstation in terms of capabilities and ergonomic load. The aim is to define the activities scheduling through two objectives: the first one considering the matches among workers abilities and workstations activities, the second one reducing the ergonomic risk of repetitive work by varying the assignments during the work shift. The method is also applied to an industrial case, whose results show its applicability and potential benefits, in terms of ergonomics and overall efficiency improvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据