4.3 Article

Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Forage Grass Varieties to Mild Drought Stress Under Field Conditions

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PRODUCTION
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 335-353

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s42106-020-00088-3

关键词

Drought stress; Forage grasses; Rain-out shelter; Photosynthesis; Proline; Phenolic compounds

类别

资金

  1. European Union's Seventh Framework Programme, project PROFICIENCY [245751]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In view of the expected increase in drought periods, researchers and breeders are searching for forage grasses that are more tolerant to drought stress. This study wanted to examine the physiological and biochemical reactions of nine forage grass varieties belonging to Festuca, Lolium and Festulolium under mild drought stress conditions in a semi-controlled field experiment. A mild drought stress treatment was applied in the period between cut II and cut III using three large mobile rain-out shelters equipped with sprinkler irrigation systems. The experiment consisted of two soil moisture treatments: (1) control where a soil moisture level of around 20% v/v was maintained and (2) drought stress where the soil moisture level decreased to 7.5% v/v. The experiment was cut 5 times in 2014 and 4 times in 2015. A total of nine varieties from five species of forage grasses were evaluated: L. perenne, L. multiflorum, F. pratensis, F. arundinacea and F. braunii. Dry matter yield, gas exchange parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence were significantly lower in drought stress than under control conditions and the physiological parameters reacted within 2 weeks after the start of the drought treatment in all species. In contrast, drought stress significantly increased water use efficiency, the content of proline, phenolic acids, flavonoids, water soluble carbohydrates and decreased neutral and acid detergent fibre on both years. Based on total dry matter yield and tolerance indices the most drought tolerant species were L. multiflorum in the first and F. arundinacea in the second investigated year.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据