4.7 Article

Nanostructured lipid carriers-mediated brain delivery of carbamazepine for improved in vivo anticonvulsant and anxiolytic activity

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119033

关键词

Carbamazepine; Nanostructured lipid carriers; Brain delivery; Anticonvulsant activity; Anxiolytic activity

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission of Pakistan [21-1590/SRGP/RD/HEC/2017]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2017R1A2B4006458]
  3. Riphah Academy of Research and Education through seed money grant program of Riphah International University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The limited brain delivery of carbamezapine (CBZ) presents a major hurdle in the successful epilepsy treatment. The potential of carbamezapine-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (CBZ-NLCs) for improved brain delivery is investigated in the current study. CBZ-NLCs were prepared by using binary mixture of trilaurin and oleic acid as a lipid core stabilized with Poloxamer 188, Tween 80 and Span 80. CBZ-NLCs were evaluated for physicochemical properties, in vitro release, in vivo brain kinetics, anticonvulsant and anxiolytic activities. The optimized CBZ-NLCs demonstrated nanometric particle size (97.7 nm), surface charge of -22 mV and high drug incorporation (85%). CBZ-NLCs displayed biphasic release pattern with initial fast followed by sustained drug release. CBZ-NLCs significantly enhanced the AUC of CBZ (520.4 mu g.h/mL) in brain compared with CBZ dispersion (244.9 mu g.h/mL). In vivo anticonvulsant activity of CBZ-NLCs in PTZ-induced seizure model showed a significant increase in the onset time (143.0 sec) and reduction in duration (17.2 sec) of tonic-clonic seizures compared with CBZ dispersion (75.4 and 37.2 sec). The anxiolytic activity in light-dark box and elevated-plus maze models also demonstrated superiority of CBZ-NLCs to CBZ dispersion. From the results, CBZ-NLCs presents a promising strategy to improve brain delivery and therapeutic outcomes of CBZ in epilepsy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据