4.7 Article

Antimicrobial activity and biocompatibility of slow-release hyaluronic acid-antibiotic conjugated particles

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119024

关键词

Hyaluronic acid microgel/nanogel; Ophthalmic drug delivery; Antibiotic release system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here, the aim was to design and use a long-lasting antibiotic release system for prevention of postoperative infections in ophthalmic surgery. Ciprofloxacin and vancomycin-conjugated hyaluronic acid (HA) particles were prepared as drug carriers for sustained release of antibiotics. The antimicrobial effects of the released drugs were determined by disc-diffusion and macro-dilution tests at different times up to 2 weeks. Slow degradable HA particles were obtained with 35.2 wt% degradation within 21 days. The drug loading amount was increased by employing two sequential chemical linking (conjugation, 2C) and one physical absorption loading (A) procedures (2C + A processes) from 148 +/- 8 to 355 +/- 11 mg/g HA particles for vancomycin. The amounts of vancomycin and ciprofloxacin that were released linearly was estimated as 64.35 +/- 7.35 and 25.00 +/- 0.68 mg/g, respectively, from drug-conjugated HA particles in 100 h. Antimicrobial studies revealed that antibiotic-conjugated HA particles could inhibit the growth of microorganisms from 1 h to 1 week. The MBC values were measured as 0.25, 4.0, and 0.25 mg/mL against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis, respectively, after 72 h incubation time. Cytotoxicity studies showed no difference between fibroblast growth or corneal thickness after 5 days with or without HA-antibiotic particles. The drug release studies and antimicrobial activity of antibiotic-loaded HA particles with time against various bacteria further revealed that HA particles are very effective in preventing bacterial infections. Likewise, cytotoxicity studies suggest that these particles pose no toxicity to eukaryotic cells, including corneal endothelium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据