4.5 Article

Computational fluid dynamics modeling of liquid-gas flow patterns and hydraulics in the cross-corrugated channel of a plate heat exchanger

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.103163

关键词

Plate heat exchanger; Cross-corrugated channel; Two-phase; Computational fluid dynamics; Flow pattern

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [713683]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The morphology of liquid-gas flows in corrugated plate heat exchangers is complex due to the intricate channel geometry. To date, only a few experimental visualizations have been performed to study the two-phase flow characteristics in plate heat exchangers. In this paper, we perform pioneering computational fluid dynamics simulations of the adiabatic liquid-gas (water-air) flow in a cross-corrugated channel of a plate heat exchanger. The standard volume-of-fluid technique is used to capture the complex phase-interfaces constructed by the cross-corrugated walls. In order to reduce the computational cost, the computational domain is simplified by a series of assumptions. The bubbly flow, slug flow, churn flow and film flow are modeled by varying the superficial velocities of both phases, and the validity of these patterns is proved by comparison with experimental results. A flow regime map is developed based on the numerical results, and the transitions between the regimes are discussed. The predicted pressure drop shows good agreement with the experimental data. The two-phase multiplier for general prediction of the friction factor in the cross-corrugated channel is calibrated. The mean void fraction in the channel is quantified by the numerical simulation. The void fraction model from Zuber and Findlay is found to be applicable to the cross-corrugated channel, which is further modified for general use for these types of channel flows. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据