4.7 Article

CRK5 Protein Kinase Contributes to the Progression of Embryogenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms20246120

关键词

auxin gradient; polar auxin transport (PAT) proteins; GA3; embryogenesis; Arabidopsis thaliana; Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase-Related Kinase (CRK)

资金

  1. Tempus Public Foundation, Hungary
  2. Biological Doctoral School University of Szeged, Hungary
  3. OTKA PD project [115502, PD128055]
  4. OTKA grant [124828]
  5. NN OTKA grant [118089]
  6. Hungarian Ministry for National Economy [GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00001, GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fine tuning of hormone (e.g., auxin and gibberellin) levels and hormone signaling is required for maintaining normal embryogenesis. Embryo polarity, for example, is ensured by the directional movement of auxin that is controlled by various types of auxin transporters. Here, we present pieces of evidence for the auxin-gibberellic acid (GA) hormonal crosstalk during embryo development and the regulatory role of the Arabidopsis thaliana Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase-Related Kinase 5 (AtCRK5) in this regard. It is pointed out that the embryogenesis of the Atcrk5-1 mutant is delayed in comparison to the wild type. This delay is accompanied with a decrease in the levels of GA and auxin, as well as the abundance of the polar auxin transport (PAT) proteins PIN1, PIN4, and PIN7 in the mutant embryos. We have previously showed that AtCRK5 can regulate the PIN2 and PIN3 proteins either directly by phosphorylation or indirectly affecting the GA level during the root gravitropic and hypocotyl hook bending responses. In this manuscript, we provide evidence that the AtCRK5 protein kinase can in vitro phosphorylate the hydrophilic loops of additional PIN proteins that are important for embryogenesis. We propose that AtCRK5 can govern embryo development in Arabidopsis through the fine tuning of auxin-GA level and the accumulation of certain polar auxin transport proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据