4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Experimental and numerical studies of laminar flame characteristics of ethyl acetate with or without hydrogen addition

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 45, 期 39, 页码 20391-20399

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.141

关键词

Ethyl acetate; Hydrogen addition; Laminar flame characteristics; Laminar burning velocity; Markstein length

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB1501405]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51506154, 51776045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen (H-2) is an effective additive to improve the issue of low laminar burning velocity of some biofuels. In order to better understand the laminar burning characteristics of ethyl acetate (EA) with or without H-2 addition, experimental investigations of laminar burning characteristics were carried out by using the high-speed Schlieren photography technique in a constant volume combustion chamber. Tests were conducted under various equivalence ratios ranging from 0.5 to 1.4 with an initial temperature of 358 K, an initial pressure of 0.1 MPa and a H-2/air proportion of 0%, 4%, 8% and 12% by volume. Laminar burning velocities, together with other parameters such as laminar burning flux, flame thickness, Markstein length and Markstein number, were calculated and discussed. In addition, the experimental data were compared with numerical simulations based on the Dayma model. Results showed that the laminar burning velocity of EA was enhanced with the increase of H-2 addition, and the maximum value reached 95.09 cm/s at phi = 0.6 with 12% H-2, a value more than twice as fast as that of pure EA (39.3 cm/s). Moreover, H-2 was found to extend the lower flammability limit of EA. The laminar burning velocities simulated with the Dayma model agreed well with the experimental results of EA at various H-2 additions. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据