4.7 Article

Facile preparation of Ni, Co - Alloys supported on porous carbon spheres for supercapacitors and hydrogen evolution reaction application

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 45, 期 3, 页码 1466-1476

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.074

关键词

Hydrothermal method; Hydrogen-evolution reaction; Supercapacitors nickel cobalt alloys; Porous carbon sphere

资金

  1. Foundation of Key Research and Development Program of Hebei Province, China [18393616D]
  2. Science and technology program of Hebei Academy of Sciences, China [2019G08]
  3. Natural Science Fund, China [18964005D]
  4. Key Basic Research Project, China [18964005D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon nanomaterials that are electrochemically bifunctional and active in supercapacitor and hydrogen-evolution-reaction (HER) applications have attracted recent research attention. We have prepared porous carbon spheres-doped Ni, Co - alloys by using a hydrothermal method with melamine and pectin as precursors and with the addition of nickel nitrate and cobalt nitrate. The corresponding materials exhibit good electrochemical performance and excellent electrocatalytic activity for HER. The overpotential (OP) of the as-prepared materials can achieve 240 mV keeping a Tafel slope (TS) of 55 mV dec(-1) at 10 mA cm(-2) in an acid (0.5 M H2SO4) solution. The corresponding samples maintain stability after 24 h and 5000 cycles in the chronovoltage and cyclic voltammetry methods, respectively. When the as-prepared materials are oxidized by 30% H2O2 for 12 h, the corresponding as-prepared oxidation samples exhibit excellent electrochemical performance in a supercapacitor application. The specific capacitance (SC) of the as-obtained materials reaches 312 F g(-1) at 1 A g(-1) with decent rate capability and cyclic stability. This work provides new applications for bifunctional electrochemically active materials. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据