4.7 Article

Multi-objective optimization for helium-heated reverse water gas shift reactor by using NSGA-II

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119025

关键词

Reverse water gas shift; High-temperature helium; Finite-time thermodynamics; Multi-objective optimization; Two-dimensional pseudo-homogeneous model; Generalized thermodynamic optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of P. R. China [51606218and 51576207]
  2. Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2018CFB708]
  3. Self-Topic Project of Naval University of Engineering [20161504]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermodynamic performance of helium-heated reverse water gas shift (RWGS) reactor is investigated by using the theory of finite-time thermodynamics. Taking into account both the radial temperature gradients and the diffusion-reaction phenomenon inside the catalytic pellets, a comprehensive two-dimensional pseudo-homogeneous mathematical model is established to represent the reactor. By using numerical calculations, the thermodynamic performance of reactors in the given conditions is analyzed, the influences of the effective parameters on reactor performance are also examined. Eventually, from the perspective of heat management and production improvement, a multi-objective optimization (MOO) procedure based on the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) is applied to investigate the best working parameters considering the minimum radial temperature difference and maximum conversion rate as optimization objective functions. The results show that significant radial temperature gradients and the resulting radial gradients of apparent reaction rate can be observed. The thermodynamic performance of the counter-flow reactor is superior to that of the parallel-flow pattern. The MOO is an effective technique for selecting the best working parameters to reduce the radial temperature difference and improve the conversion rate simultaneously. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据