4.4 Article

Accuracy of monitors used for blood pressure checks in English retail pharmacies: a cross-sectional observational study

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
卷 66, 期 646, 页码 E309-E314

出版社

ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X684769

关键词

blood pressure monitors; calibration; community pharmacy services; hypertension; primary health care

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research funding scheme [RP-PG-0407-10347]
  2. NIHR [NIHR-RP-02-12-015]
  3. NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Oxford at Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
  4. NIHR School for Primary Care Research (SPCR)
  5. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)
  6. NIHR CLAHRC Oxford
  7. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0514-10121, RP-PG-1209-10051, NF-SI-0611-10273, IS-SPC-0514-10043, CDF/01/017, NIHR-RP-02-12-015] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Free blood pressure (BP) checks offered by community pharmacies provide a potentially useful opportunity to diagnose and/or manage hypertension, but the accuracy of the sphygmomanometers in use is currently unknown. Aim To assess the accuracy of validated automatic BP monitors used for BP checks in a UK retail pharmacy chain. Design and setting Cross-sectional, observational study in 52 pharmacies from one chain in a range of locations (inner city, suburban, and rural) in central England. Method Monitor accuracy was compared with a calibrated reference device (Omron PA-350), at 50 mmHg intervals across the range 0-300 mmHg (static pressure test), with a difference from the reference monitor of +/-3 mmHg at any interval considered a failure. The results were analysed by usage rates and length of time in service. Results Of 61 BP monitors tested, eight (13%) monitors failed (that is, were >3 mmHg from reference), all of which underestimated BP. Monitor failure rate from the reference monitor of +/-3 mmHg at any testing interval varied by length of time in use (2/38, 5% < 18 months; 4/14, 29% > 18 months, P = 0.038) and to some extent, but non-significantly, by usage rates (4/22, 18% in monitors used more than once daily; 2/33, 6% in those used less frequently, P = 0.204). Conclusion BP monitors within a pharmacy setting fail at similar rates to those in general practice. Annual calibration checks for blood pressure monitors are needed, even for new monitors, as these data indicate declining performance from 18 months onwards.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据