4.7 Article

Investigations on physicochemical properties and electrochemical performance of graphite felt and carbon felt for iron-chromium redox flow battery

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
卷 44, 期 5, 页码 3839-3853

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.5179

关键词

carbon felt; graphite felt; graphitization degree; iron-chromium redox flow battery (ICRFB); thermal activation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51702144]
  2. Excellent Talent Training Program of University of Science and Technology Liaoning [2019RC04]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Colleges and Universities in Liaoning Province [2017LNQN15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, polyacrylonitrile-based graphite felt (GF), carbon felt (CF) and the effect of thermal activation on them with or without the catalyst (BiCl3) are comprehensively investigated for iron-chromium redox flow battery (ICRFB) application. The physical-chemical parameters of GF and CF after the thermal activation is affected significantly by their graphitization degree, oxygen functional groups, and surface area. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) results manifest that GF and CF before and after the thermal activation have different electrocatalytic activities owing to oxygen functional groups number increase and the graphitization degree decrease. In terms of the capacity decay rate, as oxygen functional groups provide shorter electrocatalytic pathways than bismuth ions, the performance of GF and CF after the thermal activation is more ideal. As a result, GF before and after the thermal activation exhibits higher efficiency (EE: 86%) and better stability at a charge-discharge current density of 60 mA center dot cm(-2) than those of CF during charge-discharge cycling, as the dominant limitation in an ICRFB is ohmic and activation polarization. Therefore, GF after thermal activation together with the addition of BiCl3 in the electrolyte is a more promising electrode material for ICRFBs application than CF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据