4.6 Review

Impacts of climate anomalies on the interannual and interdecadal variability of autumn and winter haze in North China: A review

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
卷 40, 期 10, 页码 4309-4325

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/joc.6471

关键词

atmospheric circulations; external forcing factors; haze; interannual and interdecadal variations; North China

资金

  1. Atmospheric Pollution Control of the Prime Minister Fund [DQGG0104]
  2. National Basic Research Development (973) program of China [2012CB417205]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41790471]
  4. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA20100304]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

From the perspectives of remote sensing and climatic factors like surface meteorological parameters, large-scale atmospheric circulations, and external forcing factors (EFFs), the authors synthesize and review spatiotemporal variations of PM2.5 over North China and how climate anomalies affect autumn and winter haze variability in North China according to recent studies. This review focuses on both interannual and interdecadal timescales. It is shown that circulations play an important role in influencing haze variability. Atmospheric circulations, which would be modulated by EFFs like sea surface temperature, sea ice, and snowpack, can affect the climate variability in haze over North China via modulation of surface-layer parameters that are closely connected with the haze phenomenon. Therefore, EFFs are deemed significant factors impacting the climate variability of haze over North China, serving as paramount precursory signals for haze prediction. Furthermore, this paper suggests potential future research directions for haze variability studies in North China on the basis of summarizing and concluding the associated processes/mechanisms on how climatic factors affect haze variability, which could provide reference for treating and forecasting in situ hazy conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据