4.7 Article

Serum levels of hsa-miR-16-5p, hsa-miR-29a-3p, hsa-miR-150-5p, hsa-miR-155-5p and hsa-miR-223-3p and subsequent risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the EPIC study

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 147, 期 5, 页码 1315-1324

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32894

关键词

chronic lymphocytic leukemia; circulating miRNA; serum; prospective study

类别

资金

  1. European Commission (DG-SANCO)
  2. International Agency for Research on Cancer
  3. Danish Cancer Society (Denmark)
  4. Ligue Contre le Cancer (France)
  5. Institut Gustave Roussy (France)
  6. Mutuelle Generale de l'Education Nationale (France)
  7. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM) (France)
  8. German Cancer Aid (Germany)
  9. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) (Germany)
  10. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Germany)
  11. Deutsche Krebshilfe (Germany)
  12. Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (Germany)
  13. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany)
  14. Hellenic Health Foundation (EPIC-Greece)
  15. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro-AIRC-Italy
  16. National Research Council (Italy)
  17. Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS)
  18. Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR)
  19. LK Research Funds
  20. Dutch Prevention Funds
  21. Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland)
  22. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
  23. World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)
  24. Statistics Netherlands (The Netherlands) [ERC2009-AdG 232997]
  25. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [BMBF 01EO1303]
  26. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness-Carlos III Institute of Health
  27. FEDER funds/European Regional Develpment Fund (ERDF)-a way to build Europe [PI13/00061, PI13/01162, PI17/01280, PI14/01219]
  28. Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red: Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP, Spain)
  29. Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR)
  30. CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya [2017SGR1085]
  31. Swedish Cancer Society
  32. Swedish Research Council
  33. County Council of Skane (Sweden)
  34. County Council of Vasterbotten (Sweden)
  35. Cancer Research UK [14136, C8221/A19170]
  36. Medical Research Council Canada [MR/N003284/1, MC-PC_13048, MC-UU_12015/1, MR/M012190/1]
  37. MRC [MR/N003284/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is an incurable disease accounting for almost one-third of leukemias in the Western world. Aberrant expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) is a well-established characteristic of CLL, and the robust nature of miRNAs makes them eminently suitable liquid biopsy biomarkers. Using a nested case-control study within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC), the predictive values of five promising human miRNAs (hsa-miR-16-5p, hsa-miR-29a-3p, hsa-miR-150-5p, hsa-miR-155-5p and hsa-miR-223-3p), identified in a pilot study, were examined in serum of 224 CLL cases (diagnosed 3 months to 18 years after enrollment) and 224 matched controls using Taqman based assays. Conditional logistic regressions were applied to adjust for potential confounders. The median time from blood collection to CLL diagnosis was 10 years (p25-p75: 7-13 years). Overall, the upregulation of hsa-miR-150-5p, hsa-miR-155-5p and hsa-miR-29a-3p was associated with subsequent risk of CLL [OR1 increment Ct-unit increase (95%CI) = 1.42 (1.18-1.72), 1.64 (1.31-2.04) and 1.75 (1.31-2.34) for hsa-miR-150-5p, hsa-miR-155-5p and hsa-miR-29a-3p, respectively] and the strongest associations were observed within 10 years of diagnosis. However, the predictive performance of these miRNAs was modest (area under the curve <0.62). hsa-miR-16-5p and hsa-miR-223-3p levels were unrelated to CLL risk. The findings of this first prospective study suggest that hsa-miR-29a, hsa-miR-150-5p and hsa-miR-155-5p were upregulated in early stages of CLL but were modest predictive biomarkers of CLL risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据