4.7 Article

Supplemental one-carbon metabolism related B vitamins and lung cancer risk in the Women's Health Initiative

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 147, 期 5, 页码 1374-1384

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32913

关键词

lung cancer; B vitamins; one-carbon metabolism; women's health

类别

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health
  2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [HHSN2682011000046C, HHSN268201100001C, HHSN268201100002C, HHSN268201100003C, HHSN268201100004C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We and others have reported associations between B vitamins principally involved in one-carbon metabolism and increased lung cancer risk; however, results for women have been inconsistent. Here we report on the association of supplemental vitamins B-6, folic acid and B-12 intake and lung cancer risk using data from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study of postmenopausal women. Between 1993 and 1998, 161,808 women were recruited to participate in the WHI at 40 clinical centers in the US. After exclusions, 159,232 women were available for analysis and followed prospectively for an average of 18.3 years. Among them, 3,836 incident lung cancer cases were diagnosed. At baseline, supplemental B vitamins from multivitamins, vitamin mixtures and individual supplements were assessed. Adjusted Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between supplemental B vitamin intake and lung cancer risk. Relative to no intake, women who took >= 50 mg/day of vitamin B-6 had 16% (HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.71-0.99) reduced lung cancer risk. Associations did not differ significantly by smoking status or lung cancer histology. Intakes of folic acid and vitamin B-12 were not associated with risk. There is a need for replication of our findings from other large, prospective studies with similar high-quality measurement of supplement intakes before any recommendations can be made at present on B-6 supplementation for lung cancer prevention in women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据