4.7 Article

Pectin-capped gold nanoparticles synthesis in-situ for producing durable, cytocompatible, and superabsorbent hydrogel composites with chitosan

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.058

关键词

Polyelectrolyte complexes; Superabsorbent materials; Nanocomposite

资金

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development - CNPq [420636/2018-8, 0008678964988973]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies report the production of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and polysaccharides-based composites. However, there are few reports about AuNPs synthesis in-situ followed by the formation of hydrogel composites. Here, we show AuNPs synthesis in-situ into the pectin solutions to yield cytocompatible pectin-capped AuNPs/chitosan hydrogel composites. Visible spectroscopy and dynamic light scattering measurements confirm the AuNPs synthesis. The hydrodynamic radius of the pectin-capped AuNPs ranges from approximately 510 to 721 nm, while the Zeta potential is around -43 mV. Scanning electron microscopy shows that the composites present compact structures. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy characterize the composites as well. Hydrogels (with or without AuNPs) containing the highest pectin content (at 4.12 pectin/chitosan weight ratio) have low stability (disintegrates approximately 60% after 14 days in phosphate buffer). Composites obtained at 3.75 pectin/chitosan weight ratio disintegrate between 25 and 30% after 14 days in phosphate buffer (physiological condition = pH 7.4). The AuNPs reinforce the hydrogel structures, increasing the elastic modulus (from 3.5 to 7.6 Pa) and decreasing the water uptake from 4465 to 2976%. 3.75 PT/CS weight ratio and 3.0 x 10(-4) M Au(III) content provide a durable, cytocompatible, and superabsorbent hydrogel composite. These properties can support materials for drug delivery purposes. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据