4.7 Article

Physical and antimicrobial properties of edible films containing Lactococcus lactis

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.09.006

关键词

Edible film; Lactococcus lactis; Antimicrobial activity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51703147]
  2. China Scholarship Council Project [201806915013]
  3. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2018RZ0034]
  4. Natural Science Fund of Education Department of Sichuan Province [16ZB0044, 035Z1373]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we developed edible films designed to control the growth of Staphylococcus aureus in tryptone soya agar. We analyzed three edible film-forming substrates: sodium alginate, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, and collagen. In addition, we evaluated Lactococcus lactis, which produces bacteriocin and lactic acid. Lactococcus lactis-containing edible films were constructed via tape-casting method. Optical, mechanical, and antimicrobial properties of the edible films were measured to examine the effects of Lactococcus lactis on film matrices. Further, we determined the survival of Lactococcus lactis after the film-drying process and viability of Lactococcus lactis stored for 24 days at 4 degrees C. Our results indicate that incorporation of Lactococcus lactis changed the physical properties of edible films. Films containing Lactococcus lactis showed reduced gloss and transparency. There are insignificant modifications were observed in terms of tensile strength and elongation at break. At 4 degrees C, used to represent a low-temperature environment, the growth of Staphylococcus aureus was inhibited for 7 days in edible films populated with Lactococcus lactis. The viability of Lactococcus lactis was higher in sodium alginate/sodium carboxymethylcellulose films, and was highest in films composed of sodium alginate and methylcellulose. In summary, our study provides a new method for functional food packaging. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据